• Akuden@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    6 months ago

    Again, incorrect. Stop reading headlines and making decisions. Read the ruling. You are spreading misinformation.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Oo, nice try turning this around on them. But nah, man, you’re refusing to acknowledge the ruling itself explicitly telling you you’re wrong. You’re not arguing in good faith. Go away.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Direct from the decision (page 31):

      If official conduct for which the President is immune may be scrutinized to help secure his conviction, even on charges that purport to be based only on his unofficial conduct, the “intended effect” of immunity would be defeated.