• Blaine
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Didn’t Democrats control the House and Senate for the first few years of his presidency? Looks like they failed to use the time they had very effectively. Why reward lazy behavior with another term?

    • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      50 votes that includes Joe Manchin, Sinema, etc in the Senate is not control. The last time they had an actual fillibuster proof majority they passed the ACA, which would have included a public option if they had another vote. And that period where they had control lasted a few months, not years. The idea that Democrats don’t pass legislation when they aren’t being blocked by the domestic terror cell they have to work alongside is completely ahistorical.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        50 votes that includes Joe Manchin, Sinema, etc in the Senate is not control.

        With the majority they had, they had enough seats to do away with the filibuster forever.

        The last time they had an actual fillibuster proof majority they passed the ACA, which would have included a public option if they had another vote.

        Nonsense. They simply would have found a different senator to vote no. Ben Nelson was every bit as instrumental as Lieberman in killing the public option.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      So the obvious solution is give control to the party that’s systematically dismantling the protections of our rights?

      • Blaine
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        No. The solution is to dump Biden and try to get a candidate that can prevent that.