He got 2000 “wrong”… Or did he?

  • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    His hypothesis is that elections are mostly not about individuals. People vote for Team Blue or Team Red. And given the embrace by evangelicals of a criminal who has never read the bible, I think he may have a point.

    The only individual characteristic that matters is incumbency, which is why Democrats shouldn’t throw that advantage away.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The only individual characteristic that matters is incumbency,

      The incumbent lost in 2020. There may be other factors.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The only individual characteristic that matters is incumbency.

        Most other factors mostly do not depend on the individual who is running. For example, recession, military victories/losses, results of midterm elections, significant third party challenger, etc. The party can run anyone and it would not affect those points.

        However, I overlooked another individual characteristic: there is an extra point if the incumbent is a victorious military leader or has significant appeal to members of the opposing party. The only person to get that point in this century was Obama, and only in 2008.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          The only person to get that point in this century was Obama, and only in 2008.

          The only one to win the Democratic primaries, at least.