• RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s becoming increasingly common around weekends in France — which gets about two-thirds of its electricity from its atomic fleet

    So they occasionally have to take a nuclear plant offline on a sunny and windy day, because we still don’t have the storage for solar to be an effective baseline.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well if that’s actually the functioning case, they are investing their effort in the wrong place. They don’t need energy production, they need storage.

      As far as your comment amount solar, we do have solutions that exist. Energy companies just need to actually get off their asses and work them into the grids.

      • Dimantina@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah storage is sadly difficult and time consuming. I mean if we aren’t just using a crap ton of lith-ION.

        • Specal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Sodium ion batteries are just about ready for mass production, they take up twice the amount of space as lithium but are just as effective and far cheaper

          • EveryoneDiesAlone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            What is your source on that? I heard some news about china making some breakthroughs on sodium ion batteries but I am waiting for independent confirmation on that because, well china has let us down more often than not with “bleeding edge” tech.

            I was thinking molten salt would be a better energy sink for the here and now.

        • Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Hydrogen gets shit on loads, but this is exactly the kind of thing it can do pretty well. When you have excess, you don’t need to have to worry about efficiency in the same way. Then it’s ready to go once needed.

      • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Who would “they” be in that case? The people who’d like cheap energy do indeed need storage. The nuclear lobbies on the other hand need to cripple their competition, so they only need their own, already present facilities and whatever means they can get to sabotage upcoming competition and secure their primary position.

          • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            “The French”? The homogenous singular entity that all have one singular set of goals and no differences whatsoever? Or the Frrench people who’d like cheap energy or maybe the French electricity lobbyists? It’s not that simple.

            • just_another_person@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              The people who live in France who are having this issue with power, as explained in the article and in the comments.

              Seems you’re bored and just attempting to inflame people into discussing how my comment was in no way reductive or trying to represent people in a way they didn’t wish to be. Go touch grass.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        While a certain amount of pumped hydro energy storage is feasible, we will never have enough storage to

      • sudo42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Nuclear Power Industry: “We need to invest $10B in nuclear plants!”
        Everyone else: “Why not just spend $1B on battery storage instead?”
        Nuclear Power Industry: “Nah, that’s not feasible.”

    • slazer2au@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      The problem is turning it back on. Xenon poisoning is an issue the prevents reactors switching off and back on again.

    • blindsight@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      We need more hydroelectric water storage. Pump water uphill all day. Doesn’t need any fancy materials, just a bunch of space on a hill connected to the grid.

  • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    isn’t their next door neighbor Germany having an energy deficit crisis cuz they’ve been dependent on Russian gas for years? Maybe they could match up somehow

  • Aniki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    How can electricity prices turn negative?

    Can’t the solar park operators just switch down the park temporarily?