TikTok says it offered the US government the power to shut the platform down in an attempt to address lawmakers’ data protection and national security concerns.

It disclosed the “kill switch” offer, which it made in 2022, as it began its legal fight against legislation that will ban the app in America unless Chinese parent company ByteDance sells it.

The law has been introduced because of concerns TikTok might share US user data with the Chinese government - claims it and ByteDance have always denied.

TikTok and ByteDance are urging the courts to strike the legislation down.

“This law is a radical departure from this country’s tradition of championing an open Internet, and sets a dangerous precedent allowing the political branches to target a disfavored speech platform and force it to sell or be shut down,” they argued in their legal submission.

They also claimed the US government refused to engage in any serious settlement talks after 2022, and pointed to the “kill switch” offer as evidence of the lengths they had been prepared to go.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Tiktok offered us the ability to shut them down? To avoid being shut down. By us. Woe to the vanquished I guess.

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The idea is that with the “kill switch” the US Government would take any blame for the shutdown. Right now the Biden Admin and Congress have successfully switched that around so TikTok looks more unreasonable. There’s no demand that they “shut down”, just that ownership be located where they are subject to US law.

      • mhague@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        We embedded third party auditors in that crypto exchange so I’m curious exactly how inscrutable tiktok really are.

        I mean the accusations are that they’re too beyond oversight and we can’t confidently audit the data, so giving us a button to stop them when we can’t see what they’re doing would be a joke. But I’m skeptical that it’s as difficult to lock down their data as we make it seem.