• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I don’t think that there is any purpose to “bringing visibility” to global warming in 2024. Effectively everyone is already aware of global warming and has been for some time.

    The issue isn’t awareness, but disagreement over the weight to put on policies to mitigate it. And I don’t expect that doing stuff like this is going to change people’s positions on that weight.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s less about visibility that it’s happening, but that it’s not properly fought.

    • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      If this isnt going to change anyones opinions, then why the outrage? We’re all fucked anyways, so let them be upset.

      More people tone policing these activists than are upset about the very possible end of our species.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The fact that you’re using the wrong term just shows that yeah, it kinda does need more visibility I guess.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          It’s not global warming though, it’s climate change because it causes extremes at both ends. It’s extremely important to stop perpetuating the wrong term.

          Maybe the one that needs to grow up is the ones not educating themselves on what the correct terms are and how it’s not just “warming”…? Yeah…

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Global warming is still a correct term because the globe is warming.

            Some areas aren’t getting warmer. But the globe is. Hence global warming, not everywhere without exception warming.

            We only moved on to saying climate change because some morons were pushing the same bullshit view that you are - iF gLoBaL wARmiNg iS ReAL hOw CoMe XYZ pLacE wAs CoLdEr tHiS yEaR???4

            • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              iF gLoBaL wARmiNg iS ReAL hOw CoMe XYZ pLacE wAs CoLdEr tHiS yEaR???4

              Funnily enough, that’s exactly why we no longer use warming, since people need to continually explain that no, it’s just warming since when that’s the word that’s used, it’s used to intentionally detract from the other side.

              We seem to agree that it causes extremes at both ends, it just seems like it’s a bunch of dinosaurs in this thread that can’t comprehend they were taught the incorrect term.

              When someone says global warming it’s a litmus test, you bring up the extremes at both ends and they give you a blank stare.

              Since they literally think it’s only warming since it’s a stupid fucking term…… it’s kinda like how politics used marijuana as a term instead of the correct cannabis term. It’s fucking propaganda lmfao. Keep perpetuating this shit though.

              • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Yes, that’s what I said. We generally say climate change now because people have idiotic takes like yours and (puzzlingly) don’t appear to understand that global warming means warming of the globe.

                We had to change the language used because people like you can’t parse basic English or apply the smallest amount of thought to the phrase.

                Global warming isn’t an incorrect term in the slightest. It describes the warming of the globe, which is exactly what’s happening.

      • kbal@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        What “wrong term”? Global warming? Because The Guardian prefers to call it “global heating”? Or am I missing something, because that complaint would be amazingly petty.

        Anyway it’s not about bringing visibility to global warming to make people aware that it’s going on. It’s about making a statement. That statement, as I understand it, is “Climate change! Wake the fuck up and do something about it, people!” I don’t know if anything will sufficiently get that message through, but it’s understandable that they want to try, and painting Stonehenge orange (reportedly in a non-toxic water-soluble paint that will wash away in the rain) seems like a somewhat effective way to get the attention of the news media.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Climate change, the article literally only uses that term… it’s quite a simple but very important distinction.

          It’s climate change since it causes extremes at both ends.

          Your ignorance isn’t an excuse.

          • kbal@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yes, the phenomenom under discussion is climate change. Specifically, it’s that change which is a result of the anthropogenic net radiative forcing that increasingly puts more energy into the global climate system, making it less predictable, more dangerous in various ways, and generally warmer, a.k.a. “global warming.”

            It’s not a religion. Correct spelling of the magic incantations does not matter. Calling it global warming, like Al Gore did, in casual conversation is fine.

            • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              and generally warmer, a.k.a. “global warming.”

              Incorrect, it also make colder temperatures colder, it’s not “generally”, one way or the other.

              See, the wrong shit IS STILL being perpetuated, and the wrong term only exacerbates it. Case in point, your ignorant comment that explains it wrong lmfao.

              Calling it global warming just shows your ignorance to the issue and your explanation proves it, it’s causes extremes at both ends, not “generally warming” like your ignorant ass is claiming lmfao.

              Edit, I see people still love to eat and perpetuate propaganda eh? Correct people incorrectly and call it “warming” lmfao. All shows is your ignorance and how asinine you are, and it’s why it works, the public does the work for them… fucking yeesh.

              • Teppichbrand@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                The earth is getting warmer, which brings chaos to a complex system. The result is extreme weather, sometimes cold and wet. But it is getting warmer on a global scale. In fact, it was never as hot in human history as as it is right now in 2024.

              • kbal@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                What a weird misconception to have. I wonder where you got it from.

                • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  The term global warming is used a political dog whistle, it was used by politicians to further a political agenda. See marijuana, crack, hippies, etc. and now the general public is doing their work by perpetuating the wrong term, to make things seem not as bad.

                  Marijuana is actually cannabis, and anyone who incorrectly uses the term can be easily seen for their bias or their lack of education on the subject.

                  It’s okay to be incorrect, the term was outdated decades ago, but continue to use it wrong and do their political work for free. This shit really went deep with these generations didn’t it…? Yeesh.