Today in our newest take on “older technology is better”: why NAT rules!

  • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah I’ve heard about punycode. Personally, I’m well against it because it puts down non-MURRICAN English domain names as second-class citizens on the internet. If I have a website about Copiapó, a perfectly legal town, there’s no good reason why the domain name should not be copiapó.cl rather than copiap-xcwhngoingohi4oleleiyho42yt4ptg4ht4.cl, making it look “suspect” and “malware-y”.

    There were quite some complains back in the time about Firefox choosing not to “flag” internationalized names as potentially dangerous, and pretty much all those complaints that I know of likely came from English speakers who simply can’t understand other countries in the world even can have different alphabets.

    • Ephera
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean, there is some legitimate concerns. For example, in theory, someone could register a domain “αpple.com” and use that to send phishing mails. That “α” is an alpha. The more alphabets and letter variants you allow, the more lookalikes there will be.

      But yeah, in practice, domain registrars check that you’re not registering such a lookalike domain and then that’s not really a problem, as far as I’m aware.