See, Apple? Even cars can do it :)

  • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Quality control on batteries that go out to customers, and make the stations legally liable.

    For example: I once pumped petrol in my diesel car due to human error by the gas station’s supply company (they put petrol in the diesel tanks). They found out about the error as I was filling up and stopped me halfway, so luckily I had no engine damage, but they had to pay for the tow and to get my tank emptied.

    how many states with counties have no inspections

    Sounds more like a “your government is shit” problem than a “this scheme can’t work” problem.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Quality control on batteries that go out to customers, and make the stations legally liable.

      Ah, so you’re wanting to transport tons and tons of batteries back to a centralized facility to be inspected and have testing done?

      Sounds more like a “your government is shit” problem than a “this scheme can’t work” problem.

      It’s not a gov problem, it’s a logistics issue.

      • Revonult@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Gas gets to the gas station somehow. Obviously it isn’t the same as transporting batteries back and forth but it’s bad faith to say this is completely unprecedented logistics problem. I am under the impression that battery health could be screened at the swap facility and would require a small subset to be returned to a hub for additional inspection or repair.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          To me, this is the biggest argument against battery swapping.

          We have this huge industry for refining, storing, distributing, distributing ending gasoline that we can entirely dismantle with EVs. All that pollution: gone. All that wasted land: gone. All those unnecessary levels of profit-seeking: gone. Now you want to choose a technology that requires rebuilding all that, except two way? You want to force the new technology to conform to old infrastructure ideas?

          How can we not prefer the alternative of “just plug it in wherever you are”? How can we not prefer the rare opportunity of simplifying something? How can we not forgo all those unnecessary profit seekers?