• shuzuko@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Nah our hands make much better foot substitutes than our feet do hands substitutes. Walking on your hands is way easier than trying to paint a masterpiece or code for hours with your feet!

    • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Nah, check out some apes, they’ve got opposable thumbs on their feet. Our feet are objectively worse, you can only stand on them.

      • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        We’re a lot better at standing, walking, and running long distances. Not sure if I’d say objectively worse, just better at different things (but objectively way less cool than peeling a banana and eating it with your feet).

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          We’re a lot better at standing, walking, and running long distances.

          I spend significantly less time doing those things than doing activities that would benefit from having more hands.

          • DaPorkchop_
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            I propose retractable foot thumbs, so you can have human-like feet for walking and monkey-like feet for playing the piano with your toes

            • Emerald@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              A lot of body parts would be better retractable but that would also be quite the unprecedented mechanism, so durability wouldn’t be great. Sadly, it just wouldn’t be practical