Russian President Vladimir Putin promised Friday to “immediately” order a cease-fire in Ukraine and start negotiations if Kyiv began withdrawing troops from the four regions annexed by Moscow in 2022 and renounced plans to join NATO. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy rejected what he called an ultimatum by Putin to surrender more territory…

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    “I’ll walk away if you let me steal what I want.” Yeah no. You’ll be back tomorrow anyway.

    • Farid@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      18 days ago

      I saw a different interpretation of the same news on Hexbear. The gist of it was as follows:

      • Putin is being bold because he’s winning and at this point can make such demands.
      • He’s even being generous, he’s winning and gives Ukraine the opportunity to stop the deaths.
      • Ukraine is not expected to accept these terms, because “the West” won’t allow them.

      So yeah…

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        18 days ago
        • Russia already made peace offers in the past. So far they always did them when things weren’t going well for them.
      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        I wonder if all of the Russian propagandists on hexbear know each other, or if they believe anyone on hexbear is a real person.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    18 days ago

    He’s lying. Ukraine’s only long term defence is NATO membership. And conceding territory worked so well with Crimea, eh.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    …after the U.S. and Ukraine this week signed a 10-year security agreement that Russian officials, including Putin, denounced as “null and void.”

    You can’t declare something “null and void”, invalid, in your legal system if it doesn’t even exist in your legal system.

    Like, you aren’t a party to this. It’s got nothing to do with you.

    Unless the claim here is that it violates the US or the Ukrainian constitutions or something like that and they’re talking about those systems, which I assume is not what’s going on.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-calls-russias-election-occupied-territories-null-void-2024-03-14/

    Ukraine calls Russia’s election in occupied territories null and void

    See, that is meaningful. Ukraine’s saying that they don’t recognize the authority of the elected people as representing the people there; they aren’t going to deal with them or extend them authority. Whether Ukraine recognizes the people there has some impact on its actions.

    But Russia isn’t going to deal with the agreement or extend it authority. There isn’t any question of them recognizing it or not recognizing it.

  • fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    18 days ago

    Fool me once, shame on you.

    Fool me twice, shame on you.

    Fool me three times? Leave me the fuck alone you annoying prick.

  • mindlight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    19 days ago

    Dear president Putin, We see this as a very reasonable deal. Will you join president Zelenskyj for a ceremonial signing at Oude Waalsdorperweg 10 tomorrow?

    • bluGill@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      18 days ago

      We have perfectly good truces from 1991 and 1994. if putin can’t accept them he cannot be trusted.

    • GrabtharsHammer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Or maybe it’s a ploy to help factions friendly to Russia rise to power in countries that currently support Ukraine.

      If an isolationist faction can pretend that Russia made a good faith bid to end the war, they can paint continued support of Ukraine as adventurism and a waste of money.

      It doesn’t have to be true. It just needs to be close enough to rhyme with the misgivings of folks that don’t want to spend their tax dollars helping Ukraine fight.

        • cynar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          18 days ago

          A depressing number of people are extremely low information voters. It’s intended to sow confusion in their minds. If you can get them into a “they are all the same” mentality, then you can either get them to vote for you, or just not bother voting (and so not voting against you).

          Basically, people who use Lemmy etc are not their target audience.

        • kshade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          German Pro-Putin politicians have already jumped on this, loudly proclaiming they want peace. That does resonate with people, especially those who are afraid.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    18 days ago

    Yes Putin, that sounds very reasonable, but alternatively and I’m sure you will find this equally reasonable. Why don’t you pull back to Moscow, and let Ukraine have their territory back, plus everything Russia has around the black sea?

    Also Russia: Stop escalating by sending in old equipment, or we will nuke you!

    I’m sure you can see where we come from, because it’s the same place you are coming from. Malignant narcissistic insanity, with zero regard for human lives or reason or anything that rhymes with decency.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Russian President Vladimir Putin promised Friday to “immediately” order a cease-fire in Ukraine and start negotiations if Kyiv began withdrawing troops from the four regions annexed by Moscow in 2022 and renounced plans to join NATO.

    Broader demands for peace that Putin listed included Ukraine’s recognition of Crimea as part of Russia, keeping the country’s nonnuclear status, restricting its military force and protecting the interests of the Russian-speaking population.

    Putin’s remarks, made to a group of somber Foreign Ministry officials and some senior lawmakers, represented a rare occasion in which he clearly laid out his conditions for ending the war in Ukraine, but it didn’t include any new demands.

    Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry called Putin’s plan “manipulative,” “absurd” and designed to “mislead the international community, undermine diplomatic efforts aimed at achieving a just peace, and split the unity of the world majority around the goals and principles of the U.N. Charter.”

    Moscow withdrew from Kyiv in March 2022 and described it a goodwill gesture as peace talks between the two began, but the pullback took place amid fierce Ukrainian resistance that significantly slowed down Russia’s battlefield advances.

    Putin also claimed that in that same month, he told a foreign official he wasn’t ruling out withdrawing forces from the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions and ceding occupied parts of them back to Ukraine, as long as Kyiv allowed Russia to have a “strong land connection” to Crimea.


    The original article contains 1,286 words, the summary contains 234 words. Saved 82%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      19 days ago

      Moscow withdrew from Kyiv in March 2022 and described it a goodwill gesture

      That’s, uh, being quite generous. They rushed to Kyiv, couldn’t take it, and had terrible supply lines. They had to retreat when Kyiv didn’t fall in two days as they expected.