• Gerudo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    Because it actually can help.

    I have light switches that don’t turn on main lights when I walk into the house. Smart devices allow me to be physically safer in my house.

    I can have my ac system not run full blast when I’m not home, I can save money.

    I can see who is at my door and communicate with them without physically opening the door, therefore, I don’t have to draw my gun if stuff is sketchy.

    Think about disabled people, they can easily control their space with just about any device.

    I am NOT a defender of big tech, but there are use cases where it can improve your life immensely.

    • lseif@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      5 months ago
      1. i dont know what u mean with this one.
      2. turn it off before you leave the house, it takes 2 seconds.
      3. use a peephole, a window, or even a camera which isnt connected to the internet.
      4. i specificed ‘able’ people for this reason. i know disabled people will find these devices useful.
      5. we clearly have different definitions of ‘immensely’…
      • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        The fuck is going on with this comment section glorifying Alexa/google home like that. A smartphone being the same as a corporate listening device? Wtf. And you are the one getting downvoted by someone who has their account on a programming instance. Bizarre.

        • 9point6@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          A smartphone being the same as a corporate listening device?

          I might have got the wrong end of the stick here, but are you insinuating the smartphone is the lower privacy risk?!

          I mean, hypothetically if one is being used nefariously why not the other, it would be a hell of a lot harder to know a smartphone was spying on you than a smart speaker. Even people running phones with supposedly private OSes like graphene still typically have several black boxes running blobs of proprietary code (the modem being the big elephant in the room).

          A smartphone is a much bigger risk to your privacy than a smart home speaker. It can do anything the speaker can do, but with magnitudes more processing power and a load of extra sensors. Plus you carry it with you everywhere and it’s constantly broadcasting your whereabouts to every cell tower nearby that’ll listen.

          FWIW, people have been trying to find evidence of these speakers spying on us for like a decade now, if they actually were, it would have been found and we’d all know.

        • lseif@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          lack of tech literacy or security conciousness and a dependance on unnecessary devices which build habits such as forgetting to turn off the ac

    • Hexarei@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      For the first one, you should look into some z wave light switches; I have my house wired with them and then I setup triggers for things like “double tap this switch up to turn on the whole room” and “double tap this switch down to start a bedtime routine”