The argument of originalists is very specifically that progress shouldn’t be made via the courts in the first place.

That is what they say, but for some reason the outcome tends to be the absolute worst interpretation of words taken out of the context of when they were written and ignoring centuries of precedent. They also tend to throw out the laws that are written in response to their rulings.

Maybe we should evaluate their honesty based on their actions and not what they say their intent is.