• sub_ubi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It’s true, the average American voter holds (academically) fringe and heterodox views on America’s third party history. The conventional wisdom among historians and political scientists is the opposite:

    Let a third party once demonstrate that votes are to be made by adopting a certain demand, then one of the other parties can be trusted to absorb it. Ultimately, if the demand has merit, it will probably be translated into law or practice by the major party that has taken it up…The chronic supporter of third party tickets need not worry, therefore, when he is told, as he surely will be told, that he is “throwing away his vote.” [A] glance through American history would seem to indicate that his kind of vote is after all probably he most powerful vote that has ever been cast.

    • John D Hicks

    The impact of third parties on American politics extends far beyond their capacity to attract votes. Minor parties, historically, have been a source of important policy innovations. Women’s suffrage, the graduated income tax, and the direct election of senators, to name a few, were all issues that third parties espoused first.

    • Rosenstone, Behr and Lazarus
    • criitz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s all fine, except when the election is a razors edge from electing Trump. Then you have to put voting third party on a backburner for a later time and vote for the one option you have.

      • sub_ubi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        I won’t be supporting the genocide, and anyone who does is subhuman.