Depending on how exactly we’re “getting rid of renting”, I don’t think they would be purchasing the building at today’s prices. The landlord is SoL… at best. ;-)
If that is how it is then the tenents would be doing good because the have stolen goods, but in the long run the problem would pop right back up and housing would be much more scarse.
Get rid of renting entirely and watch the quality of communities improve overnight.
Who would own the housing?
The people living in it?
Who would have built it for them and how would they have been paid?
I think they’re referring to already-existing communities.
It still the same problem, where would they get the resources to get ownership of that real estate?
Depending on how exactly we’re “getting rid of renting”, I don’t think they would be purchasing the building at today’s prices. The landlord is SoL… at best. ;-)
If that is how it is then the tenents would be doing good because the have stolen goods, but in the long run the problem would pop right back up and housing would be much more scarse.