Edit: it seems like the NYT missed the mark on this one.

AP reports:

Two eyewitnesses, Anna Ravn and Marie Adrian, told the daily BT that they saw a man walking toward the prime minister and then “pushing her hard on the shoulder so she was shoved aside.” They stressed that she did not fall down.

  • HejMedDig@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is blown way out of proportion or a bad translation

    This article with eyewitness reports tells that a man going the opposite way, across a city square, gives the prime minister a hard shove on the shoulder, and she almost falls over, but avoids to fall. Attacked? Yes. Beaten: No

    • v_krishna
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      Der kom en mand forbi i den modsatte retning, og han gav hende et hårdt skub på skulderen, så hun væltede til siden, fortæller henholdsvis 18- og 17-årige Marie Adrian og Anna Ravn til mediet.

      Thanks for the danish link. Definitely not “beaten”. I haven’t lived in Scandinavia in nearly 20 years and am way out of touch with politics there. What’s the reasoning behind this?

      • HejMedDig@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t think it was something planned. My guess is some idiot randomly sees the prime minister, and decides to give her a shove. She’s made some unpopular decisions. Last year she abolished a national holiday, on some questionable grounds, that it would increase employment and earlier this year, she strongly implied that the Danish working morale was low, and that we should put in more hours. She recently said it was a mistake to remove the holiday, and that her statement about work morale was taken out of context. Not that she’s going to bring back the holiday. The statement about work morale could only be interpreted one way, even in the full context of the speech she gave