• AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    What’s not included in the article is how much additional power might be produced by replacing them with newer systems.

    • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sure but you also haven’t lost any of the power that wasn’t generated by them being dead/broken

      • golli@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        Also I don’t think we’ve really run out of suitable space to install new panels. If that ever happens it might be worthwhile to replace them, but as you said we can otherwise just run them alongside new installations until they break or maintenance costs surpass their profits

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          A significant portion of the cost of solar, is the installation costs. There’s not much you can do about how much work goes into installing panels, and this will get more expensive over time as wages rise. A more efficient panel means less to install, bringing down that installation cost

          I don’t yet have solar panels so am not sure what they’d do, but at least half of my south facing roof is always shaded. Is the remaining half the roof sufficient space? I don’t know, but panel size is critical.

    • Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      What you are not considering is that silicon crystallisation and the PV panel manufacturing process in its entirety are very resource-intensive and energy-intensive. The longevity of solar panels is one of their core properties that contribute to their high degree of sustainability.