• Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’d argue that a more precise timing like 53.8 minutes is more attention grabbing. It shows finer grained control of technology; a “look here! we can do this too!” sort of demonstration.

    If we are the “more advanced” neighbor; then I could see that being done.

    • millie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s more that their knowing what an hour is would be impressive. Our selection of the hour as a measure of time is arbitrary outside of its specific context. It’s just 1/24th of our planet’s rotational period. We could just as easily split the day up into 10ths or 15ths or 7ths or whatever.

      To broadcast a signal that’s exactly an hour long to a planet that uses the hour as a measure of time might potentially imply someone trying to reference our way of measuring time. A signal that repeats every 53.8 minutes is on a timer that isn’t specifically relevant to Earth in the same way an hour exactly would be.

      • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        That signal might be insignificant to us; but it may be their way of establishing a timescale.

        The time may be derived from how long their planet takes to rotate…aka the length of one sub-unit of their day…aka 1/24th of their day.

        • Umbrias@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Or, it could be the periodicity of the lifecycle of a cool bug they like, or it could be just a random period from any huge number of celestial objects we have yet to categorize. I have a guess for which of these options it is, personally.

    • Kissaki@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Such a cycle is a cycle like any other. It’s not “more precise” when it’s shorter.

      We attribute the 53.8 according to our scale.