6-week-old boy dead after family dog attacked him in crib, Tennessee family says
abc7.com
A 6-week-old baby died in Tennessee on Thursday after the family dog attacked the newborn while he was asleep in his crib.

While Ezra was taking a nap in his crib, the family’s Husky that they owned for eight years attacked out of nowhere.

“And to just bring awareness that it could be any dog at any time. Completely unprovoked, no matter what the history is,” Chloe said.

  • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
    74·
    6 months ago

    “there was no reason, but here’s the reason” isn’t semantics. It’s just you contradicting yourself one sentence later.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      312·
      6 months ago

      Yes, semantics, I get it.

      You need things strictly defined for you but aren’t willing to provide parameters or ask questions.

      You built a sand castle and then knocked it down all by yourself.

      Very impressive.

      • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
        52·
        6 months ago

        Saying two conflicting things in the same statement isn’t semantics. It’s evidence that the author is a putz.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          12·
          6 months ago

          Whether two statements conflict with one another is a function of what those statements mean which is also called “semantics”.

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
          37·
          6 months ago

          Oh, so you’re interpreting certain words to mean something different than their intention?

          Like your choosing to define a word differently than someone else?

          Isn’t there a…word…for that…

          Oh, semantics, got it, good thing you connected the dots there.

          • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
            62·
            6 months ago

            Like your choosing to define a word differently than someone else?

            No? I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt, assuming you know English, and interpreting them as written. There’s not a whole lot of room for interpretation there.

            Though I am starting to wonder if maybe I gave you too much credit

            • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
              37·
              6 months ago

              If you don’t understand that one word can have multiple definitions, I’ll agree that your assumptions may be giving you trouble.

                • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                  36·
                  6 months ago

                  Don’t think anybody asked you about that word in particular, but at least you’re crawling toward an understanding.

                  Just for fun, “no” can semantically refer to 1) a discreet or broad lack of; or 2) an imperative command to avoid a particular action, but you probably knew that and were being semantically facetious, otherwise you would look like you done goofed up real hard.

                  • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
                    32·
                    6 months ago

                    Go look up the definition of stupid and pretend that’s what I said about your argument. No need for semantics or nuance just take it at face value I’m sure it’s accurate enough as is