• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ideally, enough mutes/blocks and that person would get a manual review.

    I don’t like automated bans because they often have false positives.

    • Dashi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I 100% agree with enough mutes/blocks leading to a manual thing.

      Automated bans are not great but they have a time and place. Theoretically they are getting better.

      My point is something should be done about these things. I don’t have the answers, but something needs to be done.

      • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Automated bans just lead to harassment and false positives. There should only be manual review on human-operated accounts.

        • Dashi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I didn’t say automated bands based on reports. Yeah those lead to harassment and abuse. Obviously not a good case for automation.

          But injecting code into the game with a 3rd party client could be automated if detected. That’s what i meant by automated bans.