EDIT, with a relevant source for context:

Since 1940, an estimated 50% of zoonotic disease emergence has been associated with agriculture (1–3). This estimate, however, is necessarily conservative because only direct agricultural drivers are considered in the epidemiological literature, i.e., within the farm gat

[…]

The intensification of animal agriculture through confinement and industrialization has directly led to the emergence of viruses including Nipah and H5N1 influenza (“swine flu”) (18) and antibiotic-resistant infectious bacteria including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli (19, 20).

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.add6681

    • buttfarts@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      Is there a vegan option that still supports animal cruelty? I don’t mind giving up meat but I need to know that all of gods creatures will still suffer from the Dominion of mankind

      • iiGxC@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        Hmm well for one thing you can pollute more to make up for your smaller environmental footprint on a vegan diet, maybe get some trash fires going in the backyard, throw plastic in the ocean, that sort of thing, and then maybe watch dog fights and buy stocks in animal ag companies to help them lobby to subsidize torturing unimaginable numbers of animals?

    • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Wish the alternatives weren’t so expensive at restaurants and the such. Honestly don’t get it, whenever I cook my self, the meat is always the most expensive part, so why is vegetarian or god forbid vegan food so expensive at restaurants? Stuff like soi meat strips are dirt cheap, not to mention will likely never spoil in storage. I know like one restaurant that actually serves the meatless food cheaper, but that one generally strives to be as mass affordable as possible.

    • usernamesAreTrickyOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Plants don’t have the same receptors as animals. Disease jumping from plants to animals is much more difficult. Even the diseases that you hear about coming from plants are usually from spraying or containmention from animal manuare produced by animal agriculture

      We aren’t dumping 73% of the worlds antibiotics on plants like we are with animal agriculture

    • AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean, I’m down as soon as our alternatives become affordable for low income families.

      • Nora
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        6 months ago

        They already are. Animal flesh is most expensive. There are plenty of plant foods that are healthier and more affordable.

      • FermatsLastAccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        There’s an inverse relationship when it comes to income and veganism. Lower income people are more likely to be vegan than high income. Additionally, POC are significantly more likely to be vegan. The image that veganism is for rich white people is a myth.

    • cumskin_genocide@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      We need more meat alternatives like dog and cat. There are millions of wild dogs and cats just waiting to be ate.

    • usernamesAreTrickyOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      6 months ago

      The H5N1 strain of bird flu is the big one right now, but it’s responsible for a large amount of disease spead

      Since 1940, an estimated 50% of zoonotic disease emergence has been associated with agriculture (1–3). This estimate, however, is necessarily conservative because only direct agricultural drivers are considered in the epidemiological literature, i.e., within the farm gat

      […]

      The intensification of animal agriculture through confinement and industrialization has directly led to the emergence of viruses including Nipah and H5N1 influenza (“swine flu”) (18) and antibiotic-resistant infectious bacteria including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli (19, 20).

      https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.add6681

      • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        6 months ago

        FFS can we please not get bird flu out and trucking?

        I’d prefer not to go through another pandemic.

        I saw too many rail cans of body bags during the last one. (I should clarify they were empty bags but still it was fuckin horrifying as medical supplies was in super short supply except body bags)

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      They were the most likely culprit in the H1N1 swine flu epidemic that almost killed a guy I know (he was a pretty healthy 20-something and had to be put on a ventilator and induced coma). The cause of that epidemic was related to literal lakes of untreated pig feces generated by factory farms and likely spread to humans via flies.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Since 1940, an estimated 50% of zoonotic disease emergence has been associated with agriculture

    If my math is right, that means 50% of zoonotic disease emergence is NOT associated with agriculture.

    So logically we should kill all of our pets and and wild animals that come anywhere near humans. Sorry fluffy… it’s for the greater good! The internet memes told me to do this!

    • usernamesAreTrickyOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      50% is a conservative estimate per the source there

      Keep in mind the heavy land use also is a big factor as removes wild creatures habitats

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Keep in mind the heavy land use also is a big factor as removes wild creatures habitats

        But isn’t that good? Less wild animals means less zoonotic disease emergence, right?

        • usernamesAreTrickyOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          No, it means you have increased wild creatures contact in areas where humans are. It means the creatures themselves will move around more than they normally might looking for somewhere to live

          Per the source

          Deforestation and conversion to human-dominated systems drive the loss, turnover, and homogenization of biodiversity and expose adjacent human communities to wildlife harboring microbes that can become zoonotic pathogens with pandemic potential (5).

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            No, it means you have increased wild creatures contact in areas where humans are. It means the creatures themselves will move around more than they normally might looking for somewhere to live

            So the solution is to kill the animals that come near us. Clearing the land of forest will make it easier to spot the disease bearing animals from a distance allowing us to kill them from further away!

            Seriously though, trying to scour around for any random fact to prove meat is bad isn’t an effective tactic. Factory farms that are cruel exists which is a strong point, so coming up with random factoids just invites silly debates about those factoids which only distracts from the stronger points about factory farms. Global Warming from cow farts is a pretty strong point too.

            You aren’t going to convince anyone to give up meat with random weak arguments. But you might get people to reduce the amount meat they eat, and choose more ethically produced meat with the more stronger arguments around factory farms. People may not become pure vegan, but if the goal is see fewer animals living in bad conditions, convincing people to reduce meat intake and have preference for meat not coming from factory farms would be a big win, wouldn’t it?

            • usernamesAreTrickyOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              The spread also comes from intensive factory farming. Having billions of creatures in extremely close contact is a major source of the disease spread in animal agriculture

              This is not some random fact, it’s been a major point for epidemiologists. For instance, antibiotic resistance is heavily tied to animal agriculture which uses 73% of the entire global antibiotic supply (source)

              Ignoring the majority of these things is not sensible to do. Advocating for killing all wild life is not going to be sensible nor even close to pratical politicy

              And it doesn’t even solve the spread of disease from farm animals who again directly cause 50% of zoonetic disease spread. The 50% figure was not including land use change. The creatures themselves are shipped around all over and put in those crampt conditions that are ripe for disease