Reasons why Mozilla VPN sucks - in a nutshell.

  • Price differences between Mull and Moz. Moz is more expensive and offers overall nothing new or even less.
  • Mullvad is longer in the business, trusted an an expert in the VPN field.
  • Less physical servers and depending on the region, overall slower.
  • Only front-end.
  • CHEF-KOCHOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    There are other drawbacks mentioned which you swipe under the carpet.

    I also do not said they rebrand Mullvad I said that it is Firefox VPN just rebranded as Mullvad VPN under the hood.

    It is a useless VPN no one need, that is the bottom line here. Years too late to cash-gab people.

    • Gamerie@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      Do you mean “Less physical servers and slower speed”? That’s just depending on the needs the consumer has. E.g. I only need a handful of server locations and okish speed. Meaning, they could serve my demands.

      I didn’t mean to put words in your mouth. I was just lousy with my wording, sorry.

      I’d rather see mozilla getting a piece of the vpn cake than any of the shady vpn providers out there. Because under the hood it is still mullvad.