A purported leak of 2,500 pages of internal documentation from Google sheds light on how Search, the most powerful arbiter of the internet, operates.

The leaked documents touch on topics like what kind of data Google collects and uses, which sites Google elevates for sensitive topics like elections, how Google handles small websites, and more. Some information in the documents appears to be in conflict with public statements by Google representatives, according to Fishkin and King.

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    361
    ·
    7 months ago

    Some information in the documents appears to be in conflict with public statements by Google representatives

    I would have never guessed that.

    • applepie@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      112
      ·
      7 months ago

      At this point if you are not assuming that corporation is pretty much lying for convenience. you aint operating in reality haha

      • trolololol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yep but I’ll add my two cents, half is lying and half is guessfull ignorance because nobody really knows how big and old systems really work.

        • daisyKutter
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          7 months ago

          No one reaches a position like Google’s without knowing to the atom every knook and crany of their systems.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      93
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Crazy how self regulation always winds up like this. By crazy I mean predictable of course.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        You’re supposed to move to a different search engine for the market to work. I already have, have you?

        • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 months ago

          This approach is doomed to fail, so long as the general public isn’t aware of the problem or its scale. Government regulation is the only way.

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            It’s enough if an alternative reached even 1%. That would still be billions of searches a year, enough to keep them running

        • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I did years ago when Google started censoring my search results even with safe search off.

          Unfortunately Bing is doing it too now and I can’t find a search engine that isn’t, though I would love to learn about one that isn’t.

          • Fungah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            This is the issue. they’re all shit. Even kagi often fails to deliver useful results. Its the best of the bunch but AFAIK their own crawler is very reliant on google.

        • OhNoMoreLemmy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I tried using some but they’re all equally shit.

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        This doesn’t have anything to with regulation. This is mainly a bunch of SEO and marketing people whining that Google hasn’t been honest with them in telling them exactly how to game their search engine.