A purported leak of 2,500 pages of internal documentation from Google sheds light on how Search, the most powerful arbiter of the internet, operates.

The leaked documents touch on topics like what kind of data Google collects and uses, which sites Google elevates for sensitive topics like elections, how Google handles small websites, and more. Some information in the documents appears to be in conflict with public statements by Google representatives, according to Fishkin and King.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Crazy how self regulation always winds up like this. By crazy I mean predictable of course.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      You’re supposed to move to a different search engine for the market to work. I already have, have you?

      • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        This approach is doomed to fail, so long as the general public isn’t aware of the problem or its scale. Government regulation is the only way.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s enough if an alternative reached even 1%. That would still be billions of searches a year, enough to keep them running

      • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I did years ago when Google started censoring my search results even with safe search off.

        Unfortunately Bing is doing it too now and I can’t find a search engine that isn’t, though I would love to learn about one that isn’t.

        • Fungah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          This is the issue. they’re all shit. Even kagi often fails to deliver useful results. Its the best of the bunch but AFAIK their own crawler is very reliant on google.

      • OhNoMoreLemmy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I tried using some but they’re all equally shit.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      This doesn’t have anything to with regulation. This is mainly a bunch of SEO and marketing people whining that Google hasn’t been honest with them in telling them exactly how to game their search engine.