• snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      111
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Kicker for the US football team Chiefs based in Kansas City gave a commencement speech where he laid out a bunch of misogynistic and homophobic bullshit including the equivalent of “women belong in the kitchen” and is getting defended by conservatives as speaking to family values or whatever they call that bullshit now.

      Sounds like you know about the guy on the right already, but for anyone else that might not know he was simply kneeling to bring attention to racism and was vilified by those same conservatives.

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          50
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          While race certainly played a part with the reaction to Kaepernick, that doesn’t mean this guy got a free pass for being white. Conservatives would have defended someone of any race who spouted misogynist word vomit.

            • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              22
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              They defend him because they like the idea of shooting liberal protesters in the street. “Murderer” is not a mark of shame to them.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                19
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                I do love how they defend him in part by saying he killed a convicted sex offender as if he could have possibly known that and as if that were his (or anyone’s) job to do.

              • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                That’s because for Conservatives you’re allowed to take lives to protect property. You are not allowed to damage property to protect lives.

                Really shows where their values are.

        • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Is Colin Kaepernick black in America? I can see he wears his hair long now but in the UK you’d just say he looks vaguely mixed race. Very Caucasian features actually, kind of looks French-Algerian.

              • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                4 months ago

                You don’t understand:
                A white woman can have a black baby.
                A black woman cannot have a white baby.

                This is very normal and makes perfect sense. Stop looking at it closely.

              • Duranie@literature.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                There’s the “One Drop rule.” (Wikipedia)

                "The one-drop rule was a legal principle of racial classification that was prominent in the 20th-century United States. It asserted that any person with even one ancestor of black ancestry (“one drop” of “black blood”)[1][2] is considered black (Negro or colored in historical terms). It is an example of hypodescent, the automatic assignment of children of a mixed union between different socioeconomic or ethnic groups to the group with the lower status, regardless of proportion of ancestry in different groups.[3]

                This concept became codified into the law of some U.S. states in the early 20th century.[4] It was associated with the principle of “invisible blackness”[5] that developed after the long history of racial interaction in the South, which had included the hardening of slavery as a racial caste system and later segregation. Before the rule was outlawed by the Supreme Court in the Loving v. Virginia decision of 1967, it was used to prevent interracial marriages and in general to deny rights and equal opportunities and uphold white supremacy."

                • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  It asserted that any person with even one ancestor of black ancestry

                  I think that means technically everyone is Black.

          • trollbearpig@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            You are not wrong, but I think you are missing the point a bit. What everyone in the thread is saying is that he got no pushback from conservatives. And instead they are defending him like they are in a cult lol. So the fact that normal people like us do attack him, like he deserves, is beyond the point of the conversation.

            I’m assuming you are just confused here lol, maybe you are trolling to derail the conversation. That’s why people are downvoting you, sadly a lot of people who argue in bad faith sound like you.

          • jabeez@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            “attacked”=people online expressing (strong) disagreement with his words. Poor thing, how will he ever recover with his millions of dollars and sheltered life! Get back to me when he’s run out of the NFL for his words.

      • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Almost makes you associate racism and misogyny with the conservatism ideology…… almost. I’m sure a few more instances like this will solidify it for more people? Maybe?

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        They can’t say Christian values anymore, so they say family values. Anytime you hear family values, they mean Christian values.

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Family values, common sense, freedom caucus, and any other thing that sounds like it should be positive but is run by conservatives is the opposite of whatever the name is.

      • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Don’t forget the other crazy part. His own mother is a medical physicist that is the complete opposite of his definition of what he believes women should be. I was going to say those head injuries are true, then I realized he is only a kicker…

    • waddle_dee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      4 months ago

      A kicker in American Football, who recently gave a speech at a Catholic College and said women will find more joy and fulfillment from being a stay at home mom than in a career.

  • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s right in the name. Conservatives want to preserve the status quo. Injustice is part if the status quo. I’m no logician but I think that means they’re on team injustice.

  • dil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Free speech” isn’t the problem though? Butker has a stupid worldview, and Kaepernick was raising awareness of a real and important issue.

    They can say whatever they want without retaliation from the government, and that’s freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is not freedom from ridicule or consequences from other people.

    It’s not some fundamental question if rights. It’s very simple: your ideas are shit, so we don’t like you and think you should shut up.

  • lugal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Freedom is always the freedom of the majority” – Elon Musk, probably

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Free speech” is code by the right wing for more of their cancel culture. They want to silence criticism. For them “free speech” is a one-way street meant to force you to listen to their bullshit.

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Funny enough from the picture you can’t see who the writer indicates as a and b.

    This is the problem though. Yeah, the white dude talking about woman requiring a kitchen is a sad asshole, but quite a few people really do think and believe it’s normal, and see the other dude kneeling as a severe insult.

    How do you communicate, with that in mind?

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    In all fairness though. One was litteraly invited to speak. And I haven’t heard anyone call him brave (though I am sure someone somewhere did). So I don’t blame orgs like the nfl and such having little to say. And frankly we should be talking more about the place that thought it was a good idea to invite him to speak… avoid graduates of that place like they have the plague.