lets-fucking-go

Not going to say it was an easy read, and certainly not as visceral or witty/scathing as Volume I. Also not going to say I 100 percent followed all the math in the sections on reproduction. But damn if it isn’t fascinating to see the fundamental mechanisms of capitalism being explained from first principles.

Funny enough, he keeps mentioning the credit system periodically throughout the book, but always deferring a discussion of it in favor of understanding first understanding the underlying mechanisms that precede credit. Then about three quarters of way through, a complete understanding of what the credit system actually is popped fully formed into my mind. He had so carefully explained the circulation and reproduction of capital that it just so clearly followed logically from what he had already shown.

spoiler

Also, I just skimmed the detailed critiques of Adam Smith sorry not sorry

  • duderium [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
    8·
    6 months ago

    I’m using voicedreamreader to read volume one during breaks at work and I’m finding myself really enjoying it, like it’s something I look forward to now. Basically I’m getting fucked at work, and Marx helps me understand how and why I’m getting fucked at work. Then I sometimes test out his ideas on my lib coworkers to see what they think (while avoiding any triggering language).

    I’m particularly fascinated with how surplus value and profit isn’t quite the same thing. I had always assumed they were the same. Also how capitalists constantly try to reduce the prices of their commodities because you get the highest surplus value from being able to sell the largest amounts of cheapest goods. I’m still shaky on this so anyone who wants to should correct me.

    I might have skipped the first third of the book (the hard part) but I plan to go back and read it eventually. Then I’ll check out the next volumes…

    The angry historical parts that come after the first third are some of Marx’s best writing IMO. In other books he’s always writing like a Hegelian economist I guess (and there’s plenty of that in Capital) but sometimes he writes in a very plain, hilarious, and often furious and biting style that is much easier to understand than usual.