“we have Dahir insaat at home” ass monorail

  • Chronicon [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    why self balancing?? lmao just make a tiny autonomous rail car that uses both rails. This is dumb. Though I will say sparsely used/rural lines are probably the least bad place to try on-demand type systems, since even if they succeed wildly they can’t be a victim of their own success since there’s only a small manageable population to pull riders from.

    • flan [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      if it’s on one rail you could have them pass each other without needing to build a second set of tracks or relying on sidings to exist

          • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Oh God that’s even worse. Guaranteed collisions via an unnecessary slow-moving part that is assumed to always function correctly.

            Rail comes in pairs already so that you only have to build one engineered area, tunnel, bridge, etc. This is a bazinga idea.

            • Chronicon [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              if you read the article, the bar is a safety mechanism for the prototype/testing stage and would not be in place on the production run.

              these test models are equipped with extendible “catching devices” that keep them from tipping over in the event of a mishap

              • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                Yes I read the article and that ambiguous language doesn’t challenge what I said.

                This is a really bad idea. The kind cooked up by academic transportation grifters looking to take a pile of money from the government to do a bad idea with the right buzzwords. This is how the bazinga industrial complex works.