“we have Dahir insaat at home” ass monorail

  • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oh God that’s even worse. Guaranteed collisions via an unnecessary slow-moving part that is assumed to always function correctly.

    Rail comes in pairs already so that you only have to build one engineered area, tunnel, bridge, etc. This is a bazinga idea.

    • Chronicon [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      if you read the article, the bar is a safety mechanism for the prototype/testing stage and would not be in place on the production run.

      these test models are equipped with extendible “catching devices” that keep them from tipping over in the event of a mishap

      • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes I read the article and that ambiguous language doesn’t challenge what I said.

        This is a really bad idea. The kind cooked up by academic transportation grifters looking to take a pile of money from the government to do a bad idea with the right buzzwords. This is how the bazinga industrial complex works.