• IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t care what system you implement, staying alive is going to require labour. We’re nowhere near utopian sci-fi style post scarcity yet.

    • Cowbee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 months ago

      Labor is required, having a Working Class and an Owning Class is not. Workers can share ownership.

      • CoCo_Goldstein@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can start your own worker’s collective. I’m sure many liked minded people would like to join a company were risk and reward are shared equally.

        • Cowbee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think that would be nice, but individual microcosms of a better system are woefully insufficient.

        • Liz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I do wonder what fraction of .ml actually tries to unionize their workplace or start a cooperative. Probably higher than most groups, but I’d wager it’s still embarrassingly low.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      human labour is a matter of nature until and if post-scarcity is achieved, although I would argue it doesn’t have to be “work”. It can just be fun.

      Wage slavery on the other hand, isn’t. It’s a human construct enforced through incredible violence.

    • DogWater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think there is an important distinction between what is required of a human to exist and what a capitalist society refers to as labor lol

      We get closer to post scarcity everyday. Just depends on if society collapses or rather we get passed this great filter.

  • Liz@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean, it turns out that if we all specialize in one type of labor or another we each become significantly more productive than if we all tried to provide for ourselves as individuals or even small collectives. If we use money as a rough way of storing the value of our labor, we can use that layer of abstraction to trade labor with each other at impersonal scales, benefitting even further from specialization and organization.

    I, for one, am glad someone else has gotten super good at growing food and building shelter so that I can concentrate on other things as I desire. I could even become a farmer, if I wanted!

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Without specialization the effectiveness of trading labor doesn’t go much beyond just doing favors for each other. I don’t get much value out of having you do a task for me if I can do it comparably as well as you can. I have to weigh the benefit of having someone else work for me and building mutual trust against the cost of being indebted to someone else and the risk of them doing differently to how I would have wanted. If we each specialize, now other people can offer labor that I can’t perform myself, and when they get good enough at their specialty it really starts to outweigh the negative sides of having someone else do the work for you.

          • Liz@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Money is necessary if you have specialization. You can’t keep track of who has done what favor to whom or how much that favor is really worth. Money is the thing that makes extreme specialization possible.

              • YeetPics@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Another enlightening comment where you sidestep the conversation to laude over others from your imaginary horse.

                Care to explain why it’s nonsense or should we just trust you bro?

  • Simon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean, it would be an order of magnitude more work to grow all the food and build the (subpar in comparison) amenities I need to survive. But I guess then I would just be a slave to nature. You can’t escape.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Rather silly to pretend the alternative to capitalism is communism.

          That’s a ridiculous false dilemma.

          Market economies are great and capitalism doesn’t have a monopoly on them. (Badumtss.)

          Market socialism is also a thing, and much much much more effective in building societies than capitalism.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nobody works in capitalism 🙄

      Exactly as valid a statement. I wish I could be as ignorant as you. Life would be so easy. Where do you even get that idea. Did the USSR make nothing? Surely they made something, right? someone worked.

      They managed to make the first artificial satellite with a developing economy and much lower starting education, all without anyone working I guess?

      • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ahhh yes, bankrupting your country while you participate in an arms race. It’s funny how little has changed.