I have friends who are Afghan who have had arranged marriages so this led me to be curious to ask, why does this practice still persist into the 21st century?

    • ribhu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      What they mean is that there is a deep rooted segregation of men and women. Especially in rural parts of India, where you can get to your mid-20s without interacting with a person from the opposite sex (not from your family i.e.). There are no social settings where you can “meet people” and hence for marriage, arranged is the only way.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      “it’s tradition” isn’t much of an explanation

      It’s not a moral answer, but it is an accurate answer.

    • One_Dunya
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      Endogamy is one of the practices that took root in Indian society as a way to enforce the caste system. Some scholars even call it the rationale behind the caste system. It’s got it’s roots in Hindu scriptures (not hating on the religion, but it does need reformation IMO).

      To read more about one of the foremost Indian/subaltern scholars on this explanation (endogamy) - https://baws.in/books/baws/EN/Volume_01/pdf/20

      P.S I think proximity to India, trade with India could have lead to the practice being observed in Afghanistan, but it also seems like Islamic clergy (majority practice this in Afghanistan) does not have entirely progressive views on this.

      • ____@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Some of this - and I speak exclusively from a layman standpoint of having worked extensively with quite a few Indian colleagues - has to do with whether an education system (or culture) prioritizes rote memorization vs critical thinking. India tends towards the former, the West mostly tends towards the latter.

        Much simpler to persist the practice across many years when the majority of folks are explicitly taught to accept what they are told and not to actually consider it.

        Context, I’m an American working for a large public company whose execs appear to have actually realized they got too aggressive with offshoring in recent years and are actually reversing the practice to a relatively sensible degree.

        There is shareholder value in workers who come from e.g., a caste system, but there is also a significant risk to shareholder value when too many levels of decision-making are sent to places where that mindset is common.

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          There is shareholder value in workers who come from e.g., a caste system, but there is also a significant risk to shareholder value when too many levels of decision-making are sent to places where that mindset is common.

          Very interesting. Can you give examples of how this became an issue?

    • Hucklebee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not if your culture doesn’t value tradition. Yet there are cultures where tradition is ingrained in it’s value systems.