• AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    So they talk about this as if it were a new innovation at the time—but could it be that this kind of woodworking was more widespread and this was just the only example to survive? Could it have been a standard part of the Acheulian toolkit?

    • Bored Stonerian@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s probably the assumption they’re working with, because historians do it all the time. Document survival for the pre-modern period is so poor that it doesn’t take very many examples to demonstrate (for all intents and purposes) that something was widespread.