• ripcord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the second ruling of contempt

    First ruling was collectively over 9 comments he made.

    This is the second, and said next would be jail time.

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is still from the first batch of contempt charges. The judge ruled on 9/10 and wanted more information before ruling on the 10th

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is the second, and said next would be jail time.

      Didn’t they say that after the first as well?

    • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      So, if I am understanding correctly, as a citizen I can threaten a judge 9 times, or threaten 9 different judges, and demand that I can only be held accountable for only one of them, or for all of them as a package only once?

        • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Feel free to explain then, because from here it looks like El Trumpo should have been thrown to jail 8 contempts ago, like any normal citizen. Right now if I was a US citizen I would be justified in citing precedent that I can’t be sent to jail or even threatened with jail time with only 6 contempts.