The network denies being a threat to security, and says Israel wants “to cover up its crimes”.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/KGArX

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    56
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ll go against the grain and say it’s fine for Isreal to remove al Jazeera because they are in an ongoing war. It’s common to remove certain “news” outlets during war and al Jazeera’s coverage of this conflict makes fox news look like a bastion of truth.

    Isreal still has access to plenty of new outlets that report negatively on the conflict and scrutinize the government.

    • m13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      “I’ll go against the grain”. Proceeds to maintain the status quo and bootlick for fascists.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        6 months ago

        Obviously ‘against the grain’ is talking about lemmy general opinion. Yes it’s status quo to remove opposing news agencies during a war.

        • TammyTobacco
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          6 months ago

          Just because something is common, doesn’t make it right. Israel is locking down anyone that dares speak out against them.

          • Fizz@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            6 months ago

            Saying “Isreal is locking down anyone that dares speak out against them” shows a complete lack of understanding over the issue. Of course you think it’s wrong if that’s what you think is happening.

    • Unbeelievable@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      6 months ago

      Tf is wrong with you? Do you even read Al Jazeera? It has been like the most trustworthy organization covering this genocide.

      They’re not censoring it for lying, but for telling the truth.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        6 months ago

        I do read articles from them posted here often. I find them to be extremely bias and quick to report events that have little evidence.

        I don’t know how you can look at this situation and come away with the opinion that they are being banned for “telling the truth”.