• EddoWagt@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      What makes it not Foss? The source code is available and you can build it yourself if you want to

        • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          8 months ago

          Care to explain? Because that’s literally the definition of open source

          • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            35
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Nope. Its not the definition of open source. Its the defenition of “source availiable”

            Real open source defenition : https://opensource.org/osd

            Real Free Software defenition : https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html

            Have a good read. If you want tl;dr, here is it

            Open source is a developement methodology in which software is licensed with the permission for everyone to collaborate and develop it. Anyone has the freedom to modify and contribute to it.

            Free software is a matter of freedom. It refers to the 4 essential freedoms a software should have, that is freedom to use, modify, share copies and share modified copies for the community however you want without restriction.

            FOSS is software that fits both theese defenitions. While practically almost all free software are open source and almost all open source software are free software, but there are few exeptions