tsugu@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoI respect people who don't like snaps, but Canonical will not abandon a successful projectslrpnk.netimagemessage-square89fedilinkarrow-up1281arrow-down150
arrow-up1231arrow-down1imageI respect people who don't like snaps, but Canonical will not abandon a successful projectslrpnk.nettsugu@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square89fedilink
minus-squarefruitycoder@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up25arrow-down2·edit-28 months agoNix, guix, flatpak, and OSI images are all better “universal” packages managers on sheer technical merits while also not be a vendor locked proprietary solution. Snaps are worse than what Redhat is doing.
minus-squaredream_weasel@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·8 months agoSheer* probably. Unless there a technical merit about cutting stuff.
minus-squaredream_weasel@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·8 months agoNp. We programmer types gotta help each other keep docs sharp ;)
Nix, guix, flatpak, and OSI images are all better “universal” packages managers on sheer technical merits while also not be a vendor locked proprietary solution.
Snaps are worse than what Redhat is doing.
Sheer* probably. Unless there a technical merit about cutting stuff.
Thx!
Np. We programmer types gotta help each other keep docs sharp ;)