• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I’m just being nitpicky because you are using CRT interchangeably with Television.

    That was intentional on my part because of the audience and good communication. You’re technically correct, but without a paragraph of tangential and irrelevant explanation your audience isn’t going to understand you. Modern parlance usage of “television” isn’t the CRT appliance, its any appliance that shows the moving pictures and sound content of television programming. If you walk into any store today and buy a TV, you’re going to get an LCD, AMOLED, or quantum dot display. None of those are CRTs, yet everyone born after about 2002 will associate a TV or Television with a flat panel non-CRT display.

    So no, interlacing is not native on CRT’s when receiving an interlaced signal.

    And in nobody’s mind was the vision of plugging a SNES into a computer monitor CRT. You introduced that idea only to show how its wrong. You win at pedantry, but lose at communication.

    If someone says to you “I’m watching TV”, do you poke your head around the back of the unit to make sure it has a tuner in it and if it doesn’t you quip back to correct them “You’re not actually watching a TV, you’re watching a monitor. A TV requires a tuner, which this unit does not have, making it a monitor, not a TV”?

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      If you were trying for good communication you would have said, "Interlacing is native on TV’s which is what the SNES was made for. "

      Everyone knows what a TV is.