Am I reading this correctly? She pulled down the girls skirt, commented on the crop top and insinuated that she thought the girl was underage?
How is this not a larger focus of the story? This woman thought it was acceptable to disrobe a child. The fact that the girl wasn’t a child doesn’t really matter to me, what the actual fuck is that logic?
Details are really fuzzy from the article, but they mention how the older woman was criticizing her for her skirt being hiked higher than her genitals. So I believe what “pulled down” means in this context is “pulled down to the appropriate height to cover her genitals”, not “pulled down to expose her genitals (i.e. disrobe)”
Ah, so now she is the fashion police?
Maybe instead of vigilantes policing how women dress, we should have a dedicated police force. Call them decency or virtue police or something like that.
Not police, that word is too aggressive, and they’re only here to guide women on how to dress. Ah, that’s it, the Guidance Patrol.
Morality Patrol!
The Patrolling Karens
“threat on her life” Really? How can one go through life being that scared?
If a Karen cannot find a minority to harass, he or she will inevitably turn on whatever target happens to be available
Ida Ann Lorenzo - name and shame
Anal Nerd In Zoo
Utah official Lorenzo sounds like an extremely repressed lesbian to be honest. Which considering what party she’s affiliated with, makes sense - Grand Old Projection party.
Was this one of Utah’s Genital Inspectors?
I wonder if the restaurant has any security footage for the court
Removed by mod
Bruh.
