• ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Guns aren’t cheap. If you can buy a gun, and you can buy ammo, you can afford insurance. It’s only the well off who already can afford firearms so I don’t get what you’re arguing? You wanna give guns to poor people?

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      No, all of that is wrong, and yes, the poor people should have guns. Everyone has the right to self defense.

      Guns can be cheap, ammo is generally affordable, and there could be many who could afford both but not insurance. $250 one time purchase versus $hundreds or $thousands annually.

      Also, there’s no way in hell you could put a requirement to pay regular insurance costs as a requirement to exercise a Constitutional right. The courts would flush that down the shithole immediately.