With the Mujahideen (Taliban and al-Qaeda), it was obvious: attack the Soviets.
But why ISIS? When they overthrew Saddam, why would they fund a group that would attack their own puppet government?
With the Mujahideen (Taliban and al-Qaeda), it was obvious: attack the Soviets.
But why ISIS? When they overthrew Saddam, why would they fund a group that would attack their own puppet government?
i mean, a middle east in peace would be bad for the oily aspirations of usa…a dozen of little terrorist groups with a islamic fundamentalist framework are another tool for desestabilizing the region and invading everywhere blaming “islamic terrorism” as the origin of the “need of intervention to restore democratic ideals”