I notice a lot of people use terms like “psychotic” or “psychopath” as insults and negative descriptions on here. These are clinical terms that are used to describe real people with difficulties, not boogeymen! I don’t disagree with the sentiment that these people are doing wrong, but if you wouldn’t use the r-slur or “autistic” as an insult (which you shouldn’t) then you shouldn’t use these words either. And I get the idea of calling someone delusional, but take care that you don’t just mean “I disagree with them.” Though by posting on neurodiverse I imagine I’m preaching to the choir.
Sincerely, a casual schizoaffective disorder haver.
“lame” and “crippled/crippled by” were pointed out to me by a friend who has muscular dystrophy a few years ago, they are also both incredibly common. I’ve sadly had quite a bit of pushback when trying to correct comrades on it (even in the old r/CTH sub)
hey have some more pushback
as a fellow “can’t walk properly” person, the last time lame applied to me was a bible passage. the only times I’m (or anyone else, unless there’s an american vs commonwealth english thing going on here) am reminded about the ability meaning is when etymology
s bring it up like it’s a problem.
it’s certainly dated to call someone “a cripple” and, again in my experience, that’s usually self-ID. Usages like crippling anxiety or a damaged mechanical system (“land a crippled airplane”) don’t seem to be disparaging or contributing to the marginalization of people so someone would have to explain to me how those are ableist.
Just passing along something that hurt my friend (and according to them, others in their circles). We also met at church so that may have played a part as well.
Yeah I ejected “crippled” from my vocab ages ago, I guess “hobbled” too? Unfortunately this kind of language change is still considered somewhat fringe, I think…
deleted by creator
Huh, really. I do not use either so much but thank fuck for that!