• AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    and they are not even close to the same on other issues (LGBTQ rights, unions, women’s rights, taxes for the rich, etc.).

    Yes they are

    If “supports genocide” is the single issue for you, then you live an immensely privileged life

    Square peg argument in a round hole of reality. Literally just copy and pasting into a thought terminating cliche what was absurd and ghoulish when you used it for healthcare.

      • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Who is president now and what has happened with those issues?

        “prove it” How about about you go look up what a null hypothesis is, brain warrior?

        • Lojcs@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          You sure you know what null hypothesis is? Its entire point is that the newcoming claim has to prove itself not the established one

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          The fact that you think any of that is Biden’s fault tells me all I need to know about how serious you are about politics and facts.

          I’m just going to link you to this comment, because your “objection” is exactly the same as theirs.

          https://reddthat.com/comment/9976883

          • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            smuglord I’m sorry you just activated my “I shut down emotionally and intellectually if I hear the wrong take” card

            I’m assuming it’s your emotional wounds that prevent you from looking into where the burden of proof lies when asserting two things are different from each other?

            • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I’m assuming it’s your emotional wounds that prevent you from looking into where the burden of proof lies when asserting two things are different from each other?

              Libs never think they have to back up their claims and assertions no matter how flimsy. The burden of proof is always on anyone whose opinion doesn’t match their propaganda. Then they tell us we’re in an echo chamber michael-laugh

              • Lojcs@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                If you genuinely think

                and they are not even close to the same on other issues (LGBTQ rights, unions, women’s rights, taxes for the rich, etc.).

                Is a flimsy statement then yes, you are in an echo chamber.