• SteveTech@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    http://google.com/ works fine for me, tested in Firefox and with curl -6. So it could actually be your side that is broken, although it is probably your ISP’s.

    • remram
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      My side works fine, Google just doesn’t like the address. It’s a tunnelbroker address, maybe they consider that bots… but only for some of their servers? It’s weird

      • SteveTech@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh okay, IMO IPv6 tunnels are worse than just disabling it, because it’s basically just a proxy with IPv6, and since there’s no encryption (at this layer) both your ISP and now the tunnel could collect your data, as well as added latency.

        But I guess it’s okay for experimentation or if you actually require IPv6 for something.

        • remram
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hard disagree there. It is a tunnel, it is plenty fast if the intermediate node is close enough, and why would you want encryption at the IP layer.

          It works great and gives me IPv6 that I otherwise wouldn’t have with my ISP (Optimum), allowing me to connect to native IPv6 site and use all the IPv6 functionality I want (dedicated IPs for containers/VMs etc).