- cross-posted to:
- todayilearned
- cross-posted to:
- todayilearned
Trendy, unproven “vampire facials” performed at an unlicensed spa in New Mexico left at least three women with HIV infections. This marks the first time that cosmetic procedures have been associated with an HIV outbreak, according to a detailed report of the outbreak investigation published today.
Ars reported on the cluster last year when state health officials announced they were still identifying cases linked to the spa despite it being shut down in September 2018. But today’s investigation report offers more insight into the unprecedented outbreak, which linked five people with HIV infections to the spa and spurred investigators to contact and test nearly 200 other spa clients. The report appears in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
The investigation began when a woman between the ages of 40 and 50 turned up positive on a rapid HIV test taken while she was traveling abroad in the summer of 2018. She had a stage 1 acute infection. It was a result that was as dumbfounding as it was likely distressing. The woman had no clear risk factors for acquiring the infection: no injection drug use, no blood transfusions, and her current and only recent sexual partner tested negative. But, she did report getting a vampire facial in the spring of 2018 at a spa in Albuquerque called VIP Spa.
What even is a fucking Vampire facial? (I mean,.I can imagine a few things, but the places you can get those aren’t usually called a ‘spa’)
Take your blood, spin out the plasma, inject the plasma into your face
Apparently this place thought that washing the needles between use was superfluous
Not even washing. They shouldn’t be reused in the first place.
You right, I totally forgot that reusing needles is a massive nono in the first place lmao
Let Boy Boy explain it for you!
I guess you can’t read? That’s unfortunate.
I mean the shortened down article does not give that info. The ars technica article does give a detailed description though. The CDC Report only give little info on what vampire facials are. Since the shortened article description from OP does already link to the CDC report, the only point to still read the ars technica article is to find out how exactly vampire facials are done
You know that the post is written like that solely for the “hahaha facial can mean something different and it’s smutty” joke, right? You… you know that, right?
Right?
Yes, it would be nice to have a comment section where a majority of users have read the article. I agree, my equally tired friend.