return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 7 months ago‘They Are Just Pissed Off’: Scott Galloway Warns Young People Are ‘Opting Out of America’ As Older Generations Failed Themwww.mediaite.comexternal-linkmessage-square141fedilinkarrow-up1336arrow-down118cross-posted to: usaaboringdystopia@lemmy.world
arrow-up1318arrow-down1external-link‘They Are Just Pissed Off’: Scott Galloway Warns Young People Are ‘Opting Out of America’ As Older Generations Failed Themwww.mediaite.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 7 months agomessage-square141fedilinkcross-posted to: usaaboringdystopia@lemmy.world
minus-squareiopq@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down17·7 months agoThat’s the federal minimum wage, cities have certainly raised their own minimum wages That’s why only like 1% of workers make the federal minimum wage
minus-squarelittletranspunk@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down4·7 months agoNice cherry picking, you got any other fallacies to throw in there?
minus-squareiopq@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down11·6 months ago1% of workers is not very impactful for the average income The workers who make $20 minimum wage in SF are not affected by $7.25 minimum wage
minus-squarelittletranspunk@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·6 months agoSo we should raise the federal minimum wage so that so-called 1% of people can’t be ignored like you’re trying to do. This is how our argument has looked to me: You: “well the average is fine” Me: “well the average doesn’t help those at the bottom” You: “well they don’t matter to the average” Your arguments need a lot more work. You just seem soulless with the points you’re trying to make.
minus-squareiopq@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down7·6 months agoWe weren’t arguing about the minimal wage. You are the one who brought it up. It’s not relevant to this discussion
minus-squarelittletranspunk@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·6 months agoOkay then what point are you trying to prove? I’ve looked at all your replies and you seem to always avoid the main question being asked. So, again, what is the point you are trying to make?
minus-squareiopq@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down8·6 months agoThings are not, in fact, worse In fact, things are better
minus-squarelittletranspunk@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 months agoAnd you have yet to prove that point
minus-squareiopq@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·6 months ago When people are polled about their own situation, they say they are in a good or a very good place
That’s the federal minimum wage, cities have certainly raised their own minimum wages
That’s why only like 1% of workers make the federal minimum wage
Nice cherry picking, you got any other fallacies to throw in there?
1% of workers is not very impactful for the average income
The workers who make $20 minimum wage in SF are not affected by $7.25 minimum wage
So we should raise the federal minimum wage so that so-called 1% of people can’t be ignored like you’re trying to do.
This is how our argument has looked to me:
You: “well the average is fine”
Me: “well the average doesn’t help those at the bottom”
You: “well they don’t matter to the average”
Your arguments need a lot more work. You just seem soulless with the points you’re trying to make.
We weren’t arguing about the minimal wage. You are the one who brought it up. It’s not relevant to this discussion
Okay then what point are you trying to prove? I’ve looked at all your replies and you seem to always avoid the main question being asked.
So, again, what is the point you are trying to make?
Things are not, in fact, worse
In fact, things are better
And you have yet to prove that point
When people are polled about their own situation, they say they are in a good or a very good place