Wilshire@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 7 个月前Judge upholds $83m E Jean Carroll defamation verdict against Trumpwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up1602arrow-down15
arrow-up1597arrow-down1external-linkJudge upholds $83m E Jean Carroll defamation verdict against Trumpwww.theguardian.comWilshire@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 7 个月前message-square59fedilink
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up8·7 个月前It’s a New York state civil case. SCOTUS would be going way out of their way to get involved in this one.
minus-squareTelodzrum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down8·7 个月前This is specifically an appeal to the federal district. Read the linked article.
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down3·7 个月前Which still doesn’t matter, because SCOTUS doesn’t get involved in civil cases unless there’s some kind of constitutional question, and there is none here.
minus-squareTelodzrum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down18·7 个月前So, I’m right? Thanks for this exchange; it’s been worthless.
It’s a New York state civil case. SCOTUS would be going way out of their way to get involved in this one.
This is specifically an appeal to the federal district. Read the linked article.
Which still doesn’t matter, because SCOTUS doesn’t get involved in civil cases unless there’s some kind of constitutional question, and there is none here.
So, I’m right? Thanks for this exchange; it’s been worthless.