• LesserAbe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why is trump an unindicted co-conspirator? Seems like if they have enough to charge those people why not him too?

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      It doesn’t say. There are state suits in Nevada, Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin, and now Arizona. He’s indicted in Georgia, so it’s probably pretty likely that he’s unindicted in at least some of them, leaving potential for future prosecution.

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m not a lawyer or a law expert, so this is purely a guess. By having him unindicted, it means he can’t be found not-guilty right now due to lack of evidence. I think that leaves him open to being indicted later once everyone else gets convicted. If AZ and the 4 other states convict the co-conspirators with Trump as unindicted (except in Georgia where he is indicted), that creates a much stronger case to bring up full indictment charges.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Also allows the application of leverage on them after conviction to become cooperators, I’d think. Make the offer after conviction but before sentencing and then recommend leniency to the judge in light of promised cooperation.

    • hasnt_seen_goonies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      He’s listed as an unindicted co conspirator. The reason for not indicting him can come down to local laws. The law in Georgia on conspiracy has a lower bar, which is why he got charged there.