• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    7 months ago

    He wasn’t shot because he was a Sovcit idiot…

    Oh, yes he was.

    Lots of Sovcit idiots are pulled over and NOT shot.

    If a Sovcit is pull over and not shot, and a Sovcit is pulled over and shot, the status of the idiot being Sovcit or not doesn’t make them be shot. Its when the idiot starts shooting at police he’s shot, just like when non-Sovcit idiots shoot at police, they’re shot.

    So no, the idiot being sovcit didn’t change the outcome.

    • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Being a sovcit led to the altercation which led to the shooting which led to the death.

      Just because not every sovcit gets shot doesn’t mean his being sovcit isn’t relevant. Not everyone who pulls a sword on police gets shot, but pulling a sword on police would be relevant if the person pulling the sword out got shot.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Yeah, but this guy wasn’t “lots of other sovcits”. He was this guy who took it way too far and suffered the consequences of his batshit ideology in a very predictable way. He did not commit his actions in a vacuum— he followed a very specific script of escalation in accordance with sovereign citizen ideology, and that is what is to blame, for it’s that influence which is undoubtedly what led him to this very predictable end.

      The article (which I quoted) spells that out very clearly and unambiguously.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        7 months ago

        he followed a very specific script of escalation in accordance with sovereign citizen ideology, and that is what is to blame, for it’s that influence which is undoubtedly what led him to this very predictable end.

        If your statement is true, why don’t all Sovcit idiots engage in gunfire with police, if its prescribed that way in their batshit insane ideology?

        • gregorum@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          This isn’t a conversation about ALL sovcits, just this one and what they did. Besides, since when do adherents to any beliefs system always follow every tenet, or even universally agree on what they even are?

          lol, your arguments are fallacious and spurious

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Their cowards? Many people talk a great game about their ideology but fail to follow through.

          Many(most?) religious texts require stoning people to death for violating certain rules. Just because most don’t, doesn’t mean it isn’t relevant if one person does because of that text…