• GeekyNerdyNerd@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Smart home devices have been a godsend for accessibility though. My dad’s got Parkinson’s disease. He couldn’t adjust our lamps without knocking them over and he couldn’t use the pullcords on the ceiling fan lights without losing his balance. Smart bulbs + Google Assistant are the only reason why he doesn’t need someone to turn the lights on/off for him.

      Not everyone has the same needs, and unfortunately if these things weren’t mass market products they probably wouldn’t exist, or only exist at a price point that nobody living on disability payments could afford.

      I’m looking into moving him over to a locally hosted setup, but this tech is still critical for a subset of people and definitely needs to exist at an affordable price.

      • ItsGhost@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Absolutely! I’m disabled and it can take me some time to get to the front door at times, especially in our old 3 story house (mistakes were made). Being able to see who was at the door, and tell them I was on my way down saved me so many missed deliveries.

    • BigDickMystic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly! A “dumb” home is just a liittle bit more inconvenient, but at least I don’t need to worry about being policed by a megacorp

        • Fredselfish
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wish I had the skill to set that stuff up and how to use raspberry pi. Any good tutorials that I can learn from?

      • RoboRay@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a bit more inconvenient on average, but it’s a heck of a lot more convenient when the power is out, the internet is down, or some giant company is just being dicks.

      • Tak
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        deleted by creator

    • Danny M@lemmy.escapebigtech.info
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We should stop calling cloud-connected iot devices “smart”. How is it “smart” to connect to the internet just to check if you can use your internet-connected doorbell?

      Actual smart home devices are AWESOME. If your iot devices use standard, open protocols, don’t connect to the internet, except for your local network and can be controlled from anywhere in your house by using tools like Home Assistant, then they’re ACTUALLY smart devices.

      We should start calling cloud iot devices “dependent” devices.

      The term “dependent” more accurately represents the nature of these devices: they are reliant on internet connectivity and proprietary protocols, limiting user control and adding unnecessary complexity to simple tasks. Unlike truly “smart” devices, these “dependent” devices are less functional and flexible, due to their need to always be tethered to the cloud.

      Think about it: if your internet goes down, your “smart” doorbell becomes nothing more than an ordinary doorbell. If the company’s servers have an outage, your “smart” security system can’t alert you of potential dangers. You’re left completely in the dark, with supposedly advanced technology that’s completely useless when it’s most needed.

      With truly smart devices that use standard, open protocols and can function independently of the internet, you maintain control and can adapt your system to meet your needs. Even without internet, these systems can continue to monitor your home, control your lights, and more. That’s the real power of smart technology.

      So let’s change the language we use and the expectations we set for this technology. Let’s demand independence from the cloud, security, and reliability from our devices. It’s time to transition from “dependent” devices to truly smart home technology.

      • peregus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly! We need more information about this. Unfortunately the majority of the people are IT security/privacy ignorant and they just buy all the shit that are on Amazon that costs a few bucks just to be able to turn on the lights asking Alexa (I find that to be really dum, except for people with ability problem and such).

    • Ruorc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have smart home devices, luke a doorbell, but I limit all traffic on them to be local network traffic only. No random requests or connections to outside servers and if I need to access it away from home I jump on a VPN. Not a solution for everyone, but it gives you a lot more control over your devices.

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So the doorbell was programmed to say “Excuse me, can I help you?” and the driver thought that was racist somehow?

      So someone at Amazon decides to take the word of a gig worker delivery driver with no verification or investigation, and shut down all of the customer’s Amazon devices? Wow, that’s not a bad precedent at all.

      • WhiteTiger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The delivery person thought the very AUDACITY to ask them why they’re there was racist. It happens all the time.

        “Hi, can I help you”

        “What, you don’t think I belong here? It’s because I’m black, isn’t it you RACIST!”

        • CAPSLOCKFTW
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          To be fair, it happens quite often that people of color are asked if they need help and what they’re looking for when they have the audacity to enter white neighborhoods

  • mars296@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only plausible situation I can see is that he or one of his employees was purchasing consumables used as part of the repair business using the affiliate accounts. More likely is that at some point in the past 7 years someone Amazon associates with his account made a purchase using an affiliate link and they used that as the excuse.

    • Danny M@lemmy.escapebigtech.info
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This didn’t happen to louis, or anyone in the rossmann group, this was a news story, he just happens to retell it.

      EDIT: I was thinking of another video, ignore what I said.

      • alerternate@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You should watch the video - the title is misleading, his amazon affiliate account was deactivated (not his whole amazon account).

        • Danny M@lemmy.escapebigtech.info
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh you’re right I’m sorry, this is not the video I thought it was. I thought it was the video from a few days ago when he was talking about what happened to Brandon Jackson!