• themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      7 months ago

      Most likely $1,000 per violation, or $3,000. Seems like a cheap cost to slander and intimidate witnesses against you.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Probably. That’s all the prosecution proposed, and Merchan would show bias if he raised the stakes. Merchan will likely propose a steeper fine for future violations.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          7 months ago

          I believe you’re right. It’s pretty ridiculous how cheap it is, though. They really ought to bring charges for witness tampering and intimidation, but I doubt that will happen.

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Yeah, New York caps contempt charges at $1000 per violation, and/or up to 30 days in jail. And no judge wants to be the first one to throw him in jail for contempt. So he just keeps getting small fines which he is (at least on paper, but that’s what the entire trial is focused on) easily capable of paying.

      • Pretzilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Jail up to 30 days per incident is possible, but realistically it needs to be gradually assessed after fines first

        And stinky diaper man-child is really hoping for a couple of days jail time he can fund raise off

        To add: someone had the brilliant idea to sentence him to 40 hours community service in liew of 30 days jail time

        Oh to see that fucker wearing an orange jumpsuit, picking up trash by the side of the road!

    • jkrtn
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Getting fucking SLaMmEd in a newspaper. This behavior will be absolutely fucking noted by “an expert” who describes possible “legal outcomes.” Gottem.

    • jkrtn
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah fucking weird for him to discuss violating a gag order on social media when he was using similar tools to be a creepy flasher sex pest.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        My point wasn’t that it’s weird for him to discuss anything, but that it’s odd that anyone would want to listen to him, or take him seriously.

        There’s plenty of other legal commentators who’ve made the same point, and they have the added benefit of not being bootlicking sex pests.

  • vegeta@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    TL;DR

    Toobin says the following is a violation:

    Trump’s post, quoting a Fox News host, reads: “’They are catching undercover Liberal Activists lying to the Judge in order to get on the Trump Jury,’ Jesse Watters.”

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m sure if they keep slapping his wrists enough he’ll eventually start to get some wrist strain or possibly even some light bruising.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    Reposting an AI generated video of Trump saying he is dumb as fuck is hardly being an activist. Dude’s cloaca hurts so bad from those memes.