• dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 months ago

    He’s just letting the free market decide. I mean, everyone knows that no company would buy a building where a worker died constructing it. And no workers would decide to work for a company without heat protections, right?

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      I assume that Miami-Dade County had a reason to draft legislation like this. There weren’t political points to be gained here since this was a low profile issue until this bill made it high profile. The county wouldn’t have gone through the effort if there wasn’t a problem to be addressed.

      I could understand repealing a statewide mandate for protections if it was costing money to enforce and wasn’t seeing results. I don’t understand restricting local governments from implementing their own local protections. What harm would the protections have done?

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        They are blue areas doing good things to help their constituents. DeSantis couldn’t have that. It’s really not any deeper than that. The cruelty is the point.

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Texas recently did something similar: they banned requiring water breaks for workers. It sounded like it was a political move to show they were helping businesses be more productive, even if it doesn’t really help much while still hurting the people they want to hurt.

    • yeather@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I have never seen a company that doesn’t have heat protections already in place.