• Karna
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ve Invidious hosted on my Little Raspberry Pi 4, and using it’s WPA app on every device I got.

    Zero ad + Decent UI + Access to highest video quality

    https://invidious.io/

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Heads up, “I’ve” is not grammatically correct when “have” is your verb. Using “have” in a contraction when you’re using past-perfect tense. For example, “I’ve been” is an acceptable shortening of “I have been”.

      • webadict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Is it actually incorrect? I don’t think it’s necessarily wrong, but it just sounds bizarre or Shakespearean if you use it when it’s not an auxiliary verb.

        “I’ve no need for that.” is a perfectly cromulent sentence.

        • Billegh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, not “incorrect,” just non-standard. The yardstick is: did your interpretation match the intended one? Clearly, he was able to get there so it’s firmly in “acceptable use.” Any further whinging about grammar is likely to just be construed as gatekeeping.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’m a prescriptivist and I think it’s fine. I suspect it might be a British vs American English thing.

            • LordWarfire@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              As a native BrE speaker I’d say “I’ve X installed” is a little weird, fine in speech but written down it doesn’t look right. “I’ve installed X” is fine.

          • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            The yardstick is: did your interpretation match the intended one?

            I think that’s just you. There’s a few examples of rules in English that aren’t required to get a point across, but sentences that break them sound grating. One such example is adjective order

            • Billegh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I think you’re conflating correctness with comprehension. Even if it isn’t correct, you could still be understood.

              • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                Per your previous comment:

                Yeah, not “incorrect,” just non-standard. The yardstick is:

                Clearly, he was able to get there so it’s firmly in “acceptable use.”

                I’m not the one conflating the two concepts.

    • MetricIsRight@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Since this change from google I have constant buffering issues on my home invidious instance, need to try updating my docker when I get home.